NIFL-ASSESSMENT 2005: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:872] RE: more from the UK
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 11:26:02 EST
- Next message: HthKar@aol.com: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:873] RE: more from the UK"
- Previous message: HthKar@aol.com: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:871] RE: spelling - I'm shocked!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j0KGQ2n25143; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:26:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:26:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1F322A91.338442DE.0004C68E@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: HthKar@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:872] RE: more from the UK X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 635 Lines: 3 Once upon a time there was something called competence-based assessment. Its origins seem to be a mixture of Tyler, through Bloom's taxonomy, 'mastery' theories of learning (some people see 'mastery learning' and 'competence-based assessment' as meaning the same thing, Robert whatever his name was who coined the phrase 'criterion referencing' - Glazer/Glaser - and so on. All you need is a set of 'transparent standards'. If you have transparent standard, everybody knows what is required and there can be no arguments about it. Either a piece of work meets these standards or it does not. What could be simpler than that? K
- Next message: HthKar@aol.com: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:873] RE: more from the UK"
- Previous message: HthKar@aol.com: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:871] RE: spelling - I'm shocked!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:45 EST
