Skip to main content

NIFL-ASSESSMENT 2005: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:872] RE: more from the UK

Archived Content Disclaimer

This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.

Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 11:26:02 EST

Return-Path: <>
Received: from literacy (localhost []) by (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j0KGQ2n25143; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:26:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:26:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <>
Precedence: bulk
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:872] RE: more from the UK
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 635
Lines: 3

Once upon a time there was something called competence-based assessment.  Its origins seem to be a mixture of Tyler, through Bloom's taxonomy, 'mastery' theories of learning (some people see 'mastery learning' and 'competence-based assessment' as meaning the same thing, Robert whatever his name was who coined the phrase 'criterion referencing' - Glazer/Glaser - and so on.  All you need is a set of 'transparent standards'.  If you have transparent standard, everybody knows what is required and there can be no arguments about it.   Either a piece of work meets these standards or it does not.  What could be simpler than that? 


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:45 EST