This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.
Return-Path: <email@example.com> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j0KHeAn27046; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:40:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:40:10 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <DE4FCD18CD7FD4118C8C00D0B774DDA40E82483F@doe.mass.edu> Errors-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Reply-To: email@example.com Originator: firstname.lastname@example.org Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk From: "Foreman, Robert" <RForeman@doe.mass.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:878] RE: Competency-based Instruction X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Status: O Content-Length: 4059 Lines: 85 The way competency-based education addresses this issue is through different levels of objectives. You can have a global objective such as the goal you site, "become more involved in your child's schooling" but you then need further "specific learning objectives" to clarify what it means to be "involved". These, when completed, move the student towards mastering the global objective. The specific learning objectives need to be expressed in behavioral terms and require performance that is observable and measurable. This makes it easy and efficient to integrate subject matter across the curriculum and to tailor lessons to meet specific student needs. Assessment is easy because the specific learning objectives describe the conditions under which a learner will be assessed, the behavior that will be performed, and the standards that must be met for acceptance. Continuing with the global objective provided above, "Become more involved in your child's schooling", the following could be a specific learning objective for a specific learning activity: "Given a blank journal and pen, the learner will attend three PTA meetings and write minutes for the meetings describing issues addressed, votes taken, and "next steps". Sentences describing things that occurred at the meeting will correctly use past tense verb forms and "next steps" will use appropriate future forms. Each journal entry must have at least twenty sentences and the learner must perform this task with 80% accuracy." The same type of activity can be used and the objective restated to deal with spelling, specific grammatical structures such as simple, compound, and complex sentences, punctuation, etc. The clarity of the specific learning objectives make them ideal for bilingual-vocational and workplace education programs where the students' goals and objectives are likely to be stated in performance terms. Robert Foreman -----Original Message----- From: Marie Cora [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 11:46 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:877] RE: more from the UK Well, maybe, but I guess I would need examples of that. For instance, if the standard is "get a library card", then yeah: the assessment is built right in: you check to see if that guy got his library card. But so many standards are not articulated that way, or simply can't be articulated in that way. But what about the standard: "become more involved in your child's schooling" - you can go at that from a million angles. You can also say that the parent attends all the PTA meetings, has donated money to the school, and volunteers in the library there - so she is becoming more involved in the child's SCHOOL - not his "schooling". So what are the checks in that standard? They must be articulated. I guess I would need to see examples of how these 'transparent standards' automatically lend themselves to a built-in assessment. marie cora Moderator, NIFL Assessment Discussion List, and Coordinator/Developer LINCS Assessment Special Collection at http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/ firstname.lastname@example.org -----Original Message----- From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of HthKar@aol.com Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 11:26 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:872] RE: more from the UK Once upon a time there was something called competence-based assessment. Its origins seem to be a mixture of Tyler, through Bloom's taxonomy, 'mastery' theories of learning (some people see 'mastery learning' and 'competence-based assessment' as meaning the same thing, Robert whatever his name was who coined the phrase 'criterion referencing' - Glazer/Glaser - and so on. All you need is a set of 'transparent standards'. If you have transparent standard, everybody knows what is required and there can be no arguments about it. Either a piece of work meets these standards or it does not. What could be simpler than that? K
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:45 EST