NIFL-ASSESSMENT 2005: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:915] RE: separate rubric

Archived Content Disclaimer

This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.

From: Howard Dooley (hdooley@riral.org)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2005 - 11:06:35 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j1HG6ZC17954; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:06:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:06:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <001601c5150d$1cc04d10$1b01a8c0@riral.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Howard Dooley" <hdooley@riral.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:915] RE: separate rubrics for ESOL and ABE
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 755
Lines: 21

I, too, am interested in the question of separate rubrics for ESOL and
ABE/ASE learners.  At my program we don't differentiate, and the
simplified reason is that we don't hold learners to different standards.
Our instructors see "good writing" as "good writing" whoever is doing
the writing.

Of course, at the lower levels of the rubric, one can usually
distinguish the native born speakers and writers from the ESOL speakers
and writers by the type of errors and issues in the writing.  But, does
that mean there should be a different rubric, or qualifiers, or
descriptors for ESOL learners?

Is separate inherently unequal, or it is appropriate and necessary to
facilitate learning?

Howard L. Dooley, Jr.
Director of Accountability, Project RIRAL



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:46 EST