NIFL-ASSESSMENT 2005: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:948] Re: NAAL Discussion

Archived Content Disclaimer

This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.

From: PHCSJean.2163953@bloglines.com
Date: Mon Mar 07 2005 - 12:08:04 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j27H84C22060; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:08:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:08:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1110215192.2348253109.14234.sendItem@bloglines.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: PHCSJean.2163953@bloglines.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:948] Re: NAAL Discussion Begins Today!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
Status: O
Content-Length: 635
Lines: 14

I suspect it's too early to tell since the report hasn't been released, but
to you have any tidbits on the differences in the stats you uncovered? I know
in the '92 reporting, Level 1, the lowest level, and the folks we would find
in an ABE population, rated at 21-23% on the three subtests in the general
population. If I remember correctly, only 25% of that population was non-US
born and largely Hispanic. If I were to guess on the 2003 stats, I'd think
that 25% non-US born and primarily Hispanic has changed drastically.

Have
the Level One stats increased or decreased?

Jean Marrapodi
Providence
Assembly of God Learning Center



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:46 EST