This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.
Return-Path: <email@example.com> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j27H84C22060; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:08:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:08:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1110215192.2348253109.14234.sendItem@bloglines.com> Errors-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Reply-To: email@example.com Originator: firstname.lastname@example.org Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk From: PHCSJean.firstname.lastname@example.org To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:948] Re: NAAL Discussion Begins Today! X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain Status: O Content-Length: 635 Lines: 14 I suspect it's too early to tell since the report hasn't been released, but to you have any tidbits on the differences in the stats you uncovered? I know in the '92 reporting, Level 1, the lowest level, and the folks we would find in an ABE population, rated at 21-23% on the three subtests in the general population. If I remember correctly, only 25% of that population was non-US born and largely Hispanic. If I were to guess on the 2003 stats, I'd think that 25% non-US born and primarily Hispanic has changed drastically. Have the Level One stats increased or decreased? Jean Marrapodi Providence Assembly of God Learning Center
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:46 EST