NIFL-ASSESSMENT 2005: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1056] RE: FW: [AAACE-NLA
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Date: Wed Apr 13 2005 - 14:33:14 EDT
- Next message: Norene Peterson: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1057] RE: FW: ARCS questions"
- Previous message: Marie Cora: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1055] RE: FW: ARCS questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j3DIXEG21477; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <000201c54057$7513a000$1a01a8c0@riral.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Howard Dooley" <hdooley@riral.org> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1056] RE: FW: [AAACE-NLA] Announcement: Report on Performance Levels for Adult Literacy X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 1286 Lines: 26 It is interesting and a lot to digest, since I haven't been following the process for the NAAL. What caught my eye yesterday was a section on "Developing new performance levels." The NAAL levels will allow policy makers to answer 4 broad questions ( page ES-4), and essentially be descriptors. As they say, "the assessment was not designed to provide information about what adults need to function adequately in society" and "these performance levels are not intended to represent standards for what is required to perform adeequately in society" and "the assessments were not developed to support such inferences." They do go on to answer the question I was rummaging around for: "In identifying these levels, we were conscious of the fact that one of the audiences for NAAL results will be adult education programs...Although it is not possible to establish a one-to-one correspondence between the NAAL and NRS levels, there appears to be a rough parallel between nonliterate in English and the NRS beginning literacy level; between below basic and the NRS beginning basic and low intermediate levels; and between basic and the NRS high intermediate level." I hope to wade into the text this weekend and see how they arrived at this "rough parallel." Howard, Project RIRAL
- Next message: Norene Peterson: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1057] RE: FW: ARCS questions"
- Previous message: Marie Cora: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1055] RE: FW: ARCS questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:48 EST