This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.
Return-Path: <email@example.com> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j3Q0P7G26840; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:25:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:25:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <BE92F44A.64B2firstname.lastname@example.org> Errors-To: email@example.com Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Originator: email@example.com Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk From: Varshna Narumanchi-Jackson <email@example.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1074] RE: Report on Performance Levels for X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 3961 Lines: 119 If I understood this correctly, Marie, it is a discussion on a point that Tom Sticht brought up a long time ago -- about response rates (80% vs 60% in this case) and the correlation to proficiency levels. I think this is truly important to understand because of the implications of changing the proficiency levels and level descriptors. I'm curious to see how states' performance and targets may be affected as a result of the committee's recommendations. I would be in favor of an online discussion. Thanks! Varshna. --------------- Varshna Narumanchi-Jackson Austin, TX on 4/25/05 10:50 AM, Marie Cora at email@example.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Would folks be interested in a discussion with staff that worked on this > project? > > Here's the executive summary: http://www.nap.edu/execsumm_pdf/11267.pdf > > It's about 22 pages, but the first 13 give you a very good over view of > the project. And if you want just a decent thumbnail, read the > Executive Summary and the Problem Statement at the beginning. > > Thanks, > marie cora > Moderator, NIFL Assessment Discussion List, and > Coordinator/Developer LINCS Assessment Special Collection at > http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/ > > firstname.lastname@example.org > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On > Behalf Of Connor, Bill > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:13 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1054] Re: FW: [AAACE-NLA] Announcement: > > There is an overview available on the site as a pdf. It appeared to be > about a forty page document. Also you can go into the book and read and > print selected pages. All of the above are at no cost. > > Bill Connor > Senior Product Manager > CTB McGraw-Hill LLC > 1-831-393-7429 > > -----Original Message----- > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On > Behalf Of Katrina Hinson > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 7:28 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1053] Re: FW: [AAACE-NLA] Announcement: > > It doesn't look like the report is available for reading unless it's > purchased. > > Can you provide an overview? > > Katrina Hinson > > >>>> email@example.com 04/13/05 5:49 AM >>> > Dear everyone, I thought this might be of interest to some of you. > marie > > -----Original Message----- > From: firstname.lastname@example.org > [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Soroui, > Jaleh > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:51 AM > To: National Literacy Advocacy List sponsored by AAACE > Subject: [AAACE-NLA] Announcement: Report on Performance Levels for > AdultLiteracy > > April 12 -- The Committee on Performance Levels for Adult Literacy of > the National Research Council released their interim report this > morning. This report details the work and findings on performance levels > for adult literacy. The Committee on Performance Levels that was > established in response to the US Department of Education's request was > charged to: > 1. Review and evaluate the procedures for determining the performance > levels for the 1992 NALS and > 2. Recommend a set of performance levels for the 2003 National > Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL) that are appropriate and allow > comparisons between the two assessments. > > To view the full report, please go to > http://nationalacademies.org/topnews/ > > > > Jaleh Behroozi Soroui > Education Statistics Services Institute > American Institutes for Research > 1990 K Street, NW Suite 500 > Washington, DC 20006 > Phone: 202/403-6958 > email: firstname.lastname@example.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > AAACE-NLA mailing list: AAACE-NLA@lists.literacytent.org > http://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/listinfo/aaace-nla > LiteracyTent: web hosting, news, community and goodies for literacy > http://literacytent.org > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:49 EST