This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.
Return-Path: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j5OFQiG09692; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:26:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:26:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <007c01c578d0$dd62fd70$3002a8c0@ben2ut66kkx7o3> Errors-To: email@example.com Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Originator: email@example.com Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk From: "Amy R. Trawick" <email@example.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1144] Re: TABE X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 1550 Lines: 49 Marie, earlier you said that the TABE and GED are not reading tests. Specifically, you commented "They were not developed that way, constructed that way, and they are not structured that way." I understand your comment in terms of the GED, but I'm curious why you say this about the TABE Reading test. Are you saying that the TABE developers had no *intention* of measuring reading, or that they failed in the attempt? Amy Amy R. Trawick North Wilkesboro, NC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marie Cora" <email@example.com> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 10:32 AM Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1140] Re: TABE > Hi everyone, > > Hmmm...I still don't find the TABE to be a test of reading. Even with > the thoughtful ideas on it presented by folks. You need to be able to > read to do the test, true. So the way I interpret that is to say that > one has enough skills to be able to tackle (or master) a > selected-response test (multiple choice test). > > What do others think? > > marie > > -----Original Message----- > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On > Behalf Of AWilder106@aol.com > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 5:33 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1128] Re: TABE > > Debbie, > > Thanks for your forbearance. > > Thanks also for your cut on the TABE. Yes, I'd say a readng achievement > test, with an assumption that the person knows how to read the words > presented. > > Andrea >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:50 EST