NIFL-ASSESSMENT 2005: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1185] RE: high-stakes te
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Date: Mon Aug 01 2005 - 12:56:02 EDT
- Next message: Nancy Hansen: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1186] RE: high-stakes testing, state/federal"
- Previous message: Katrina Hinson: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1184] RE: high-stakes testing, state/federal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j71Gu2G18341; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20050801165357.53905.qmail@web40707.mail.yahoo.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Nancy Hansen <sfallsliteracy@yahoo.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1185] RE: high-stakes testing, state/federal accountability, and standardized tests X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Status: O Content-Length: 1524 Lines: 58 Thanks, David, for the additional metaphors. I think they are a real visual way for us all to "appreciate" the topic. Nancy Hansen Sioux Falls Area Literacy Council sfallsliteracy@yahoo.com --- David Rosen <djrosen@comcast.net> wrote: > Marie has asked from some additional kitchen utensil > metaphors for > standardized assessment. Here are three more to add > to the (edited) > list: > > 1) Standardized testing may not always be the > sharpest knife in the > drawer. > 2) Let's use the best knives we have, but also get > some better knives. > 3) Let's not use knives when spoons or forks are > better. > 4) Avoid using knives to hammer nails or fasten > buttons (ouch). > 5) Let's not use "the only knife in the drawer" to > cut the throat of > learners in programs with just literacy level one ( > whom *I* believe > it's unrealistic to expect will increase two grade > levels in one > reporting period.) > > 6) Let's train those with knives to use them > properly. > 7) Using a knife to eat peas or mashed potatoes is > inefficient and > uncouth. If you don't have forks and spoons, don't > settle for using > knives. > 8) Utensils may help in cooking, but only if there's > food to cook. (A > kitchen version of my favorite farming metaphor for > testing, "You > don't fatten a calf by weighing it.) > > David J. Rosen > djrosen@comcast.net > > ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
- Next message: Nancy Hansen: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1186] RE: high-stakes testing, state/federal"
- Previous message: Katrina Hinson: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1184] RE: high-stakes testing, state/federal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:51 EST