This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.
Return-Path: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j71It2G23689; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:55:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:55:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <004201c596cb$deba3580$0202a8c0@frodo> Errors-To: email@example.com Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Originator: email@example.com Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk From: "Marie Cora" <email@example.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1189] Request to hear from USDOE and Funders X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 934 Lines: 38 Dear List members: At the end of Phil's post, he raised these important questions: One final thing that I have never heard in discussions of high-stakes testing is anything from the USDOE folks or other funders -- do *they* see program quality improving as a result of requiring these tests? Do they feel that the learners are being better served now? Phil Cackley REEP Arlington, VA This is truly information we need and want to know. If there are folks on the list who fall into the above categories (USDOE/Funders), would you please provide a response? If there are folks on the list who might not fall into these categories, but who can speak to these questions, would you please provide a response? Thank you, marie cora Moderator, NIFL Assessment Discussion List, and Coordinator/Developer LINCS Assessment Special Collection at http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/ email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:51 EST