NIFL-ASSESSMENT 2005: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1190] Re: Request to hea
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Date: Mon Aug 01 2005 - 15:40:50 EDT
- Next message: Katrina Hinson: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1191] RE: high-stakes testing, state/federal"
- Previous message: Marie Cora: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1189] Request to hear from USDOE and Funders"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j71JeoG26564; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:40:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:40:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <42EE7B27.5080409@ccsdistrict.org> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Jane Meyer <meyer_j@ccsdistrict.org> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1190] Re: Request to hear from USDOE and Funders X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Status: O Content-Length: 1513 Lines: 36 Marie Cora wrote: >At the end of Phil's post, he raised these important questions: > >One final thing that I have never heard in discussions of high-stakes >testing is anything from the USDOE folks or other funders -- do *they* >see program quality improving as a result of requiring these tests? Do they feel that the learners are being better served now? > >If there are folks on the list who fall into the above categories >(USDOE/Funders), would you please provide a response? > >If there are folks on the list who might not fall into these categories, >but who can speak to these questions, would you please provide a >response? > > I am not a funder or from USDOE, but I am a program coordinator in Canton, Ohio whose program is participating in a pilot project through the USDOE. The project is called STAR (Student Achievement in Reading) and its purpose is to teach teachers strategies to improve reading in adult intermediate (NRS levels 3 and 4) learners. The first training we had focused on diagnostic reading assessment, going beyond the TABE or CASAS to assess alphabetics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension in order to determine instructional needs and instructional levels. STAR is based on reading research which states we need to assess struggling readers in alphabetics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. I think this is the position of USDOE. You can get more information on this from the ARCS website at www.nifl.gov/readingprofiles. Jane Meyer > > >
- Next message: Katrina Hinson: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1191] RE: high-stakes testing, state/federal"
- Previous message: Marie Cora: "[NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1189] Request to hear from USDOE and Funders"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:51 EST