[Assessment 1109] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Tue Feb 5 13:32:14 EST 2008
- Previous message: [Assessment 1108] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Next message: [Assessment 1120] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Jackie,
Thank you for this information. I believe this research must be what my
former Spanish teacher was basing her argument on for bilingual education
in the K-12 school system.
Tina
Tina Luffman
Coordinator, Developmental Education
Verde Valley Campus
928-634-6544
tina_luffman at yc.edu
"Jackie Coelho" <jackie.coelho at gmail.com>
Sent by: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov
02/05/2008 11:13 AM
Please respond to
The Assessment Discussion List <assessment at nifl.gov>
To
"The Assessment Discussion List" <assessment at nifl.gov>
cc
Subject
[Assessment 1108] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
Hi Tina,
This has been researched already and is the basis for the arguement in
favor of bilingual education, a good idea that was not implemented in
the best way. For many years people have known that a good foundation
in literacy in the first language will facilitate learning in a second
or third language.
Another interesting twist is the existence of languages that are not
written.
Jackie
On 2/5/08, Tina_Luffman at yc.edu <Tina_Luffman at yc.edu> wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> My experience teaching ELAA students in the GED class is similar to that
of
> Gail. If the student has a solid educational background in the country
they
> came from in their native language, they tend to advance rather quickly
and
> get their GED. Those coming with 6th grade educations from their country
or
> lower tend to stay in the GED class for years and do not make much
> advancement.
>
> This experience relates well to research done among Native American
tribes
> teaching them English. Those Native Americans who were first taught
literacy
> skills in their own tongue learned English much quicker than those who
tried
> to learn literacy skills in English without that background in their own
> tongue. I also found similar problems when I was learning Spanish. The
> concepts I could mentally translate from English to Spanish were much
easier
> to grasp and learn than those I didn't know in English. Perhaps this is
> something deserving more research.
>
> Tina
> Tina Luffman
> Coordinator, Developmental Education
> Verde Valley Campus
> 928-634-6544
> tina_luffman at yc.edu
>
> -----assessment-bounces at nifl.gov wrote: -----
>
> To: "The Assessment Discussion List" <assessment at nifl.gov>
> From: "Gail Burnett" <gburnett at sanford.org>
> Sent by: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov
> Date: 02/04/2008 06:34PM
> Subject: [Assessment 1104] {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or
> Comments?!
>
>
> Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
> Warning: (not named).
> Warning: Please read the "AttachmentWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more
> information.
>
> In our small adult education program, my experience (just about three
years)
> is that students with solid educational backgrounds advance,
particularly if
> they're not working too many hours. Those who advance the slowest, if at
> all, are immigrants who are barely literate in their first language. I
would
> say that lack of education is a bigger factor than lack of time; a
student
> who works full-time and is exhausted often will still succeed because
he/she
> is familiar with academic work, and is goal-oriented. What we do is try
to
> get our low-level students to come up with goals, but that's a hard
concept
> in a second language.
>
> This does not mean that the factors mentioned in the research don't play
a
> part, though. I'm one of those barely-trained teachers (transitioned
from
> another career, got trained mainly through workshops rather than
classes).
> My skill level very well may contribute to students' slow advancement.
It's
> hard for small adult education programs to get highly skilled ESL
teachers.
> The pay is low and there are no benefits. But my program is encouraging
me
> to get extra training and has me on a plan of improvement. I think we're
> making some progress.
>
> Does this address any of the issues? And am I submitting it right?
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of Marie Cora
> Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 6:50 PM
> To: Assessment at nifl.gov
> Subject: [Assessment 1103] No Questions or Comments?!
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm so surprised! No one has anything to comment on regarding your
> program's effectiveness at helping ESL students advance?? I was very
> curious to know if subscribers experience the same types of issues that
Dr.
> Chisman and Dr. Crandall found in their research: a lack of intensity
of
> instruction/few protocols for transitioning students/few opportunities
for
> professional development.
>
> What are the issues in your program that you feel inhibit the ESL
student
> from advancing? What do you try to do about that?
>
> Please post your questions and comments now.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Marie Cora
> Assessment Discussion List Moderator
>
>
> Marie Cora
> marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com
> <mailto:marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com>
> NIFL Assessment Discussion List Moderator
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system
manager.
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> -------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Assessment mailing list
> Assessment at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
> Email delivered to tina_luffman at yc.edu
>
>
> -------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Assessment mailing list
> Assessment at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
> Email delivered to jackie.coelho at gmail.com
>
>
>
-------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Assessment mailing list
Assessment at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
Email delivered to tina_luffman at yc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lincs.ed.gov/pipermail/assessment/attachments/20080205/63117e5d/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Assessment 1108] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Next message: [Assessment 1120] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]