[Assessment 1202] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions orComments?!

Archived Content Disclaimer

This page contains archived content from a LINCS email discussion list that closed in 2012. This content is not updated as part of LINCS’ ongoing website maintenance, and hyperlinks may be broken.

Mary Lynn Simons macsimoin at hotmail.com
Fri Feb 8 15:27:23 EST 2008



Don't forget that 1/3 of high school grads cannot pass the GED; that is how it is normed. The old test was a snap and the Spanish old test was a double snap, much easier than the English.

From: forrest at crosslink.net
To: assessment at nifl.gov
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:36:58 -0500
Subject: [Assessment 1193] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions orComments?!




















Jim,



I’m with Jodi on this. Many people would take exception with
the idea that the Spanish GED is too hard. I think people who have studied
economic/educational benefits by and large think BOTH the English and Spanish
GED’s, as well as high school diplomas, are TOO EASY. I believe the research
shows that GED holders have a far higher rate of placement in developmental education
than do high school graduates, but that data may be based on the OLD GED.



Forrest







From:
assessment-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:assessment-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf
Of Jodi Crandall

Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:49 AM

To: The Assessment Discussion List

Subject: [Assessment 1185] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions
orComments?!







Jim,









I think you've summarized how I feel as well.











We can discuss the various options with students, but in the
end, if we offer Spanish Literacy and Spanish GED, it's their choice.
Some will choose to do everything in English and take longer to do it, but
others will choose to work in their own language. For some students,
the Spanish GED provides short-term benefits. But they will still need
ESL for future academic or vocational training, if they have limited English.











Have any programs tried to encourage students in Spanish
Literacy or Spanish GED to take ESL classes as well?











Jodi





























On Feb 8, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Schneider, Jim wrote:









I feel compelled to put my two cents in on the Spanish GED.



My experience is that both Andres and Ted have valid points. Here
in Eastern Iowa, there are few bilingual employers. Employers that are
bilingual rarely pay the best wages and are typically short of employees if
there are any signs of INS.



On the other hand, many of the students who have completed the
Spanish GED are already employed, and have fairly decent English skills, but
are short on time. Attaining the GED provides them the opportunity for
advancement at work and/or access to postsecondary education/training.



It has been excruciating watch the one or two who insist on the GED
in English get through the Literature and Writing portions of the test.



And the difficulty of the new Spanish GED tests are such that it is
a rare student who can pass it. The old Spanish GED was attainable for most
learners who had a 6-8th grade education. We have found that it is virtually
impossible for anyone with less than a 10-11 grade education By simply
translating the English test into Spanish and then utilizing the standard
scores/norms of the English test, students who have passed it,
have EARNED their GED.



Jim S.









From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:assessment-bounces at nifl.gov]
On Behalf Of Ted Klein

Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 8:49 AM

To: The Assessment Discussion List

Subject: [Assessment 1175] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions
orComments?!



Andres,











I'm not too sure that some of your perspectives haven't been
somewhat altered by living in El Paso. I say that with total respect for El
Paso and for your answer. Let me explain. First, I've lived in Texas most of my
life, except for some time overseas. I know just about all of our border towns,
from El Paso to Brownsville. I've also lived in nine countries outside of the
United States and traveled perhaps in twenty more. AXIOM: All over the
world, border towns are different from other towns.
Persons, regardless of ancestry, who live in border towns anywhere
tend to be bicultural and bilingual. They also tend to identify with each other
on close levels as being a well-made "tossed salad." If
most or all of your students plan to stay in El Paso for the rest of their
lives, I totally agree with what you say. However, if they want to go to cities
north of the border area; Dallas, Ft. Worth, Austin, Houston, Waco, or out of
state, then the picture changes. I am almost as comfortable in Spanish as I am
in English and have dealt with persons from every country in Latin America
comfortably and successfully, as well as Spain. However, I do not represent
anything close to a majority, particularly when it comes to having a business.
When persons go for job interviews in non-border towns, being truly
bilingual is a great asset and can even result in higher pay and better
opportunities. That is true for Spanish speakers and English
speakers. However, most of your persons who have had to take the GED in Spanish
are not truly bilingual. That's a fact and when they go for a job interview,
the human resources person doesn't need paperwork to know that there may be
communication problems with clients and on the telephone. The fact is that life
is short. However it is long enough for persons to spend a couple of more years
acquiring English if it gives them more options in life. Again, if they plan to
spend their lives in a border town, this may not be a problem at all.











Three years ago, my wife and I and one of our colleagues,
took an ESL teaching gig at a cookie factory in Austin. Quite a few of
their employees did not speak English and the company wanted to fix that
situation. There were 27 persons who had volunteered to take English classes at
work, maybe six hours a week. The first problem was how to determine
divisions of 27 students among three teachers. I got out a brief
"test" that I had used to determine readiness for the ALCPT tests in
the past.











Here is a copy:













ORAL
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS TO DETERMINE ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE












Block 2 Ted Klein











Questions marked with an
asterisk * are mandatory. Of the remaining questions, ten should be selected at
random. Speech of the interviewer will be at normal speed and clarity, with NO
exaggeration.











1. What is your name please?*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------











2. Where are you from?*
-------











3. What part of XXXXXXX are
you from?-------











4. What is your native
language? -------











5. How long have you been in America?
-------











6. Do you read English?*
-------











7. Did you study English in
your country? -------











8. How long did you study
English? -------











9. Are you enjoying the
U.S.A? -------











10. What do you like here?
-------











11. Is there anything that
you don't like? -------











12. Have you studied any
other languages besides English? -------











13. Why do you want to learn
English? -------











14. How many years of
education have you had? -------











15. Do you have any hobbies?
What are they? -------











16. Do you have any American
friends to practice English with? -------











17. Do you work? Where?
-------











18. What are your plans for
the future? -------











19. Why did you come to America?
-------











20. Do you have any questions
for me? -------

















Mark responses: 0 no
answer. 0+ telegraphic/very simple response.





1 simple, but complete
response. 1+ functional and clear response.





2 somewhat elaborate,
fairly clear and mostly grammatical response.











Interviewees with ten or more
answers in the 1+ to 2 range should be ready to take a written





proficiency test of listening
and reading skills. Non-readers are excluded. (ref: Ques. 6)













The three of us interviewed the 27 candidates together. 19
out of the 27 were not able to answer the second question: e.g.
(Teacher) Where are you from?





(Candidate) ¿Mande? (Teacher) Where are you from?
¿Como? (Teacher) Are you from Mexico? (Candidate) México,
"jes." One answered, "México, no, Peru sí."











The 8 students who were able to answer that question and
maybe four or five more questions were assigned to an "advanced
class." The others were split into two groups. What happened here? Many of
these persons had lived in Austin for some time. Some for up to ten years. Most
had families. The families naturally used Spanish at home, even their children
who spoke English at school. They had Spanish-speaking supervisors. They
watched television in Spanish. They ate at Mexican restaurants. They went to
Spanish-speaking doctors. 95% of their friends were Hispanic. In plain
language, if they wanted to stay at the cookie factory, making cookies, they
didn't need English, although the company preferred that they
know English for upward mobility. This program went on for three or four
months.The company merged and our program ended. We did not use Spanish in
class. In early training I use materials that I developed based on some of the
old "direct methods;" picture flashcards, Cuisenaire rods, etc. and
we also concentrated strongly on English sounds, particularly listening and
identification. The program went surprisingly well and many of the students
were very disappointed when it ended. They had already found some new places to
go and some were acquiring English-speaking friends.











So what is the good news? Several of our former students
have entered the Austin Community College AE program and are doing well. One of
them is in my class now. She has a child and often works at night at the cookie
factory. Sometimes she comes in looking very tired, but she's surviving.
She wants to be a Certified Nursing Assistant. She'll make it! She plans to
take the GED in English next year and enter the Nursing Program at ACC. Most of
her future patients will not be bilingual and she will be ready for them.











That's about it.











Ted






www.tedklein-ESL.com











----- Original Message -----







From: andresmuro at aol.com





To: assessment at nifl.gov






Sent: Thursday, February
07, 2008 12:02 PM





Subject: [Assessment 1153]
Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!











Ted:



How would the employer know the language that Julian took the GED in?

In most states the certificate does not tell you the Language. Texas is one of
the few states that tells you the language. However, it is so hard to find that
most people wouldn't even know. I have a hard time finding the language reference
even though I have seen millions of certificates. Fact is most employers don't
even know that people can take the GED in anything other than English, don't
ask and do not scrutinize certificates to figure out scores, language, etc. A
few might, but the majority don't. For low literacy Spanish speakers it may
take them a couple of years to be ready to take the GED in Spanish. It make
take them 2 more years to be ready for the English GED. Would you rather hold
them two more years. They can take the GED in Spanish and continue to study
English. Once they have sufficient English, they can decide if they want to
take it in English or to move on to other things.



Andres















-----Original Message-----

From: Ted Klein <taklein at austin.rr.com>

To: The Assessment Discussion List <assessment at nifl.gov>

Sent: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 6:58 am

Subject: [Assessment 1150] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or
Comments?!





Jodi and Andres,











There is one very real problem with taking the GED in
Spanish that I'm aware of. If you have two immigrants, Roberto and Juán, and
they both apply for the same job and if Juán took the GED in Spanish and
Roberto took it in English, guess who gets the job?





Yes, life isn't fair, but most U.S. businesses prefer
persons who have gone "all the way" with English. My students and I
have discussed this and they have seen or know of this situation with their
friends and family members. That is why many AE students remain longer in our
ESL classes. Of course in many border towns, this may not be as important since
many of the employers are Hispanic or are native speakers of English who are
functional in Spanish. However, many customers of the businesses will need to
use English.











In my current class in Austin, Texas with eleven
students, five different languages are spoken. Should we offer the GED in
Arabic, Chinese, Korean, and Juba as well as Spanish?

















Ted





www.tedklein-ESL.com
























----- Original Message -----







From: andresmuro at aol.com





To: crandall at umbc.edu
; assessment at nifl.gov






Sent: Wednesday, February
06, 2008 5:21 PM





Subject: [Assessment 1146]
Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or Comments?!











Jodi:



The credit ESL program in the college is very academic. However it provides
students with financial aid and other goodies. We feel that the students will
not do well in a credit academic ESL program until they have a level comparable
to GED in their native language. Also, a GED certificate is a way to
demonstrate ability to benefit to qualify for financial aid. Those students who
get into the credit ESL program without native language literacy don't do well.




Students can attend other ESL classes in the community while they are attending
our classes. We stopped providing ESL because of limited funding to provide
what we would consider meaningful ESL. Also, our Spanish GED program is fairly
intensive and our students would not have enough time to attend an additional program.
We have a few students who may be attending our classes and an ESL class
concurrently. Those are a minority



The truth is that we started as an ESL literacy program many years ago. There
was virtually no funding for literacy ESL unless it had all kind of
testing requirements. Also, it is very hard to train teachers to be really good
at ESL. The system that encourages large number of untrained part timers
prevents this from happening.



I know that a lot of people in these listservs claim exemplary service and
illustrate with examples of what they have done. I don't doubt that
their claims are 100% true. However, we are in the minority. If I could
get you and Heide and Elsa and Andy Nash and Leonore and Deborah Schwartz, and
Anson Green and Federico and others to be my ESL teachers, I would have the
best program in the world. However, the fact is that in addition to the
barriers that ESL students face in their daily lives, plus the bureaucratic and
assessment barriers that the system creates for teachers and students, plus the
difficulty hiring and retaining highly qualified ESL staff makes it very
difficult to have a successful ESL program.



I feel that until we get rid of WIA/NRS it will be tough to create good stuff
in a systematic way.



Andres



















-----Original Message-----

From: JoAnn (Jodi) Crandall <crandall at umbc.edu>

To: The Assessment Discussion List <assessment at nifl.gov>

Sent: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 1:27 pm

Subject: [Assessment 1141] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or
Comments?!

Andres,















It is great that you provide Spanish language literacy and GED classes for







your students. There's no question that native language literacy







contributes not just to the development of the first language, but also to







English language development when students take oral ESL classes. There







is some research in this area by Michele Burtoff with Haitians in the U.S.







and there is a lot of research (see especially research by David Ramirez







which compares children who had 6, 3 or no years of bilingual education)







that shows that providing bilingual education not only has all the







benefits that would be expected, but students also achieve in English as







well or better than those who only had instruction in English.















We also found that Spanish GED classes had large numbers of students at







the colleges, since students who take the GED in Spanish are able to







bypass the need for extensive ESL just to get this credential. They might







want to take ESL as well, but the desire for the GED is often for







work-related reasons. I'm not clear on why you ask students to wait until







after they have passed the GED to take ESL classes. Can you tell us a







little more about that?















Of course not all students who enroll in adult ESL are Spanish speakers







and there may not be enough who speak any language to provide literacy







classes for them in their own language, but programs might try to partner







with immigrant or refugee-related community-based organizations which







could reach more students and also identify someone to provide the







instruction. Still, there will be students who will not be able to take







literacy classes in their own languages and for them, a separate ESL







literacy class seems to be the best option.















It would be great to hear from others about their experiences both with







first language (Spanish and other languages) literacy classes, Spanish GED







classes, and literacy ESL classes.















How do you place students in your literacy classes? Do you use a







standardized test or do you have informal ways of determining if someone







would be better served in a literacy ESL class?























Jodi
















>









> Problem is that in many ESL people are placed in ESL classes based on an









> English placement multiple choice test. A student with advanced education









> in L1 and one with little education in L1 may know very little English









> and they may both be placed in the same level. The student with advance









> education will progress much faster than the one with little education.









> The advanced L1 student will understand concepts like sentence,









> paragraph, verb, subject, direct object, adjective, composition and essay









> readily. The one with with little education will need to understand these









> concepts. It takes a while for people to master these concepts. A highly









> educated L2? learner will likely progress faster academically in a second









> language than a fluent native speaker of that? language with limited









> academic education, for the same reason. This is observed regularly in









> universities all over the US. highly educated foreign students who









> acquired English as L2 recently will do better than their Eng









> lish speaking counterparts in academic tasks in English. Jim Cummins has









> articulated this clearly with his BICS and CALPS.









>









> In our program at El Paso Community College we have found evidence of









> this. We stopped doing literacy ESL a while back for this reason. The









> college has an academic ESL program. Instead of doing ESL literacy we









> started offering Spanish Literacy and GED many years ago since the vast









> majority of our students are Spanish speakers. Once our students acquire









> their Spanish GED they transition into the ESL program and do better than









> those students who don't have L1 academic skills. Even if takes them a









> while to acquire the L1 literacy, they will do better. Those with no L1









> literacy often stay in ESL forever and they drop out, start again in









> another program, drop out and continue the same pattern. I think that this









> happens because of the mixture of academically ready students and those









> that are not ready, since most ESL programs focus on traditional









> academics. For L1 low literacy students to be able to progress in L2 there









> has to be a program specifically designed for them that teache









> s skills in L2 in new and innovative ways without interference from









> academically skilled L1 students. Right now we don't have a system that









> systematically does this, and the WIA/NRS system prevents this form









> happening.









>









> Hope that this makes sense,









>









> Andres









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> -----Original Message-----









> From: Jackie Coelho <jackie.coelho at gmail.com>









> To: The Assessment Discussion List <assessment at nifl.gov>









> Sent: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 5:01 am









> Subject: [Assessment 1128] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or









> Comments?!









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> Forrest,









>









>









> ?? I like the idea of separate classes for those with a literacy









> background and those without. These two groups have such different needs.









> Having both in the class make it difficult for a teacher to meet the needs









> of either group well and I find that often the stronger students dominate









> the class, and their drive push the teacher forward. If the instructor









> does not keep up with the students who are learning at a faster rate, they









> often become frustrated and leave or mentally check out. However, if the









> instructor keeps up with those students, the others are unable to keep up









> and they get frustrated.









>









>









>









> ? I think that literacy could perhaps be separated out. And regardless of









> how you do it, well-trained instructors are essential.









>









>









> Jackie









>









> ?









>









>









> On 2/5/08, Forrest Chisman <forrest at crosslink.net> wrote:









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> To all of you who commented on level of prior education as a factor in









> student performance:









>









>









> ?









>









>









> Everyone with whom Jodi Crandall and I talked believes that more highly









> educated students do better in terms of ?persistence, learning gains, and









> transitions. And learning theory would lead us to expect this. Regrettably









> we found very little hard data about how much difference prior education









> makes, because too few programs track the level of prior education of









> their students and correlate it with outcomes. DO any of you do this? That









> is, do you have any data on HOW MUCH difference level of prior education









> makes? Or any strong impressions? And are there "cut points" in prior









> education that seem to make a difference -- e.g. students who are









> completely illiterate, students who at least reached high school, high









> school graduates, college graduates, etc. -- ?or is level of prior









> education pretty much of a continuum?









>









>









>









> ?









>









>









> More importantly, what can programs DO to narrow the gap between highly









> educated students and those with less prior education? Presumably students









> with very low levels of education are more likely end up in the lower









> level ESL courses (Literacy or Low-Beginning levels) why are (almost by









> definition) ?in the business of teaching basic literacy and sometimes









> math. Why isn't this enough? In your experience, does the "gap" exist at









> these levels too, or mainly at higher levels? At any levels, would it be









> desirable to place less highly educated students in separate classes from









> those with more education and adjust the curriculum/support systems for









> them accordingly? Some programs have tried "native language literacy" or









> the Spanish GED. What has been the experience of any of you with these









> approaches? Any other ideas? IS there an adult ESL equivalent of









> "bi-lingual education" that should be tried?









>









>









>









> ?









>









>









> It seems to me that we need to come up with better ideas. Because the









> people who study immigration tell us that the level of education of









> immigrants has been falling. And if Immigration Reform mandates large









> numbers of undocumented people to "learn English" (whatever that means),









> ESL programs may be swamped with students who have very little education









> in their native countries and too little money to serve them. ?So anyone









> who has any ideas about how to bridge this "education gap" could help us a









> lot by posting ideas about how to close it on this discussion list.









>









>









>









> ?









>









>









> Forrest Chisman









>









>









> Vice President









>









>









> CAAL









>









>









> ?









>









>









> ??









>









>









> ?









>









>









>









>









> From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:assessment-bounces at nifl.gov] On









> Behalf Of Tina_Luffman at yc.edu









>









> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:32 PM









> To: The Assessment Discussion List









> Subject: [Assessment 1109] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or









> Comments?!









>









>









>









>









>









>









> ?









>









>









>









> Hi Jackie,









>









> Thank you for this information. I believe this research must be what my









> former Spanish teacher was basing her argument on for bilingual education









> in the K-12 school system.









>









>









> Tina









>









> Tina Luffman









> Coordinator, Developmental Education









> Verde Valley Campus









> 928-634-6544









> tina_luffman at yc.edu









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> "Jackie Coelho" <jackie.coelho at gmail.com>









>









> Sent by: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov









>









>









> 02/05/2008 11:13 AM









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> Please respond to









> The Assessment Discussion List <assessment at nifl.gov>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> To









>









>









>









>









>









> "The Assessment Discussion List" <assessment at nifl.gov>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> cc









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> Subject









>









>









>









>









>









> [Assessment 1108] Re: {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or ? ? ?









> ?Comments?!









>









>









>









>









>









>









> ?









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> Hi Tina,









>









> This has been researched already and is the basis for the arguement in









> favor of bilingual education, a good idea that was not implemented in









>









> the best way. For many years people have known that a good foundation









> in literacy in the first language will facilitate learning in a second









> or third language.









>









> Another interesting twist is the existence of languages that are not









> written.









>









>









> Jackie









>









>









> On 2/5/08, Tina_Luffman at yc.edu <Tina_Luffman at yc.edu> wrote:









>









>> Hi list members,









>>









>> My experience teaching ELAA students in the GED class is similar to that









>> of









>> Gail. If the student has a solid educational background in the country









>> they









>









>> came from in their native language, they tend to advance rather quickly









>> and









>> get their GED. Those coming with 6th grade educations from their country









>> or









>> lower tend to stay in the GED class for years and do not make much









>









>> advancement.









>>









>> This experience relates well to research done among Native American









>> tribes









>> teaching them English. Those Native Americans who were first taught









>> literacy









>









>> skills in their own tongue learned English much quicker than those who









>> tried









>> to learn literacy skills in English without that background in their own









>> tongue. I also found similar problems when I was learning Spanish. The









>









>> concepts I could mentally translate from English to Spanish were much









>> easier









>> to grasp and learn than those I didn't know in English. Perhaps this is









>> something deserving more research.









>









>>









>> Tina









>> Tina Luffman









>> Coordinator, Developmental Education









>> Verde Valley Campus









>> 928-634-6544









>> tina_luffman at yc.edu









>









>>









>> -----assessment-bounces at nifl.gov wrote: -----









>>









>> To: "The Assessment Discussion List" <assessment at nifl.gov>









>









>> From: "Gail Burnett" <gburnett at sanford.org>









>> Sent by: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov









>









>> Date: 02/04/2008 06:34PM









>> Subject: [Assessment 1104] {Dangerous Content?} RE: No Questions or









>> Comments?!









>>









>>









>> Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed









>









>> Warning: (not named).









>> Warning: Please read the "AttachmentWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more









>> information.









>>









>> In our small adult education program, my experience (just about three









>> years)









>









>> is that students with solid educational backgrounds advance,









>> particularly if









>> they're not working too many hours. Those who advance the slowest, if at









>> all, are immigrants who are barely literate in their first language. I









>> would









>









>> say that lack of education is a bigger factor than lack of time; a









>> student









>> who works full-time and is exhausted often will still succeed because









>> he/she









>> is familiar with academic work, and is goal-oriented. What we do is try









>> to









>









>> get our low-level students to come up with goals, but that's a hard









>> concept









>> in a second language.









>>









>> This does not mean that the factors mentioned in the research don't play









>> a









>









>> part, though. I'm one of those barely-trained teachers (transitioned









>> from









>> another career, got trained mainly through workshops rather than









>> classes).









>> My skill level very well may contribute to students' slow advancement.









>> It's









>









>> hard for small adult education programs to get highly skilled ESL









>> teachers.









>> The pay is low and there are no benefits. But my program is encouraging









>> me









>> to get extra training and has me on a plan of improvement. I think we're









>









>> making some progress.









>>









>> Does this address any of the issues? And am I submitting it right?









>>









>> ________________________________









>>









>









>> From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of Marie Cora









>> Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 6:50 PM









>









>> To: Assessment at nifl.gov









>> Subject: [Assessment 1103] No Questions or Comments?!









>









>>









>>









>> Hello everyone,









>>









>> I'm so surprised! ?No one has anything to comment on regarding your









>> program's effectiveness at helping ESL students advance?? ?I was very









>









>> curious to know if subscribers experience the same types of issues that









>> Dr.









>> Chisman and Dr. Crandall found in their research: ?a lack of intensity









>> of









>> instruction/few protocols for transitioning students/few opportunities









>> for









>









>> professional development.









>>









>> What are the issues in your program that you feel inhibit the ESL









>> student









>> from advancing? ?What do you try to do about that?









>>









>









>> Please post your questions and comments now.









>>









>> Thanks!









>>









>> Marie Cora









>> Assessment Discussion List Moderator









>>









>>









>









>> Marie Cora









>> marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com









>> <mailto:marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com>









>









>> NIFL Assessment Discussion List Moderator









>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment









>









>>









>>









>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and









>> intended









>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are









>> addressed.









>> If you have received this email in error please notify the system









>> manager.









>









>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for









>> the









>> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not









>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.









>









>> -------------------------------









>> National Institute for Literacy









>> Assessment mailing list









>> Assessment at nifl.gov









>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to









>









>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment









>









>> Email delivered to tina_luffman at yc.edu









>>









>>









>> -------------------------------









>> National Institute for Literacy









>> Assessment mailing list









>









>> Assessment at nifl.gov









>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to









>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment









>









>> Email delivered to jackie.coelho at gmail.com









>>









>>









>>









> -------------------------------









> National Institute for Literacy









> Assessment mailing list









>









> Assessment at nifl.gov









> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to









> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment









>









> Email delivered to tina_luffman at yc.edu









>









>









>









>









>









> -------------------------------









> National Institute for Literacy









> Assessment mailing list









> Assessment at nifl.gov









>









> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to









> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment









>









> Email delivered to jackie.coelho at gmail.com









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









>









> -------------------------------









> National Institute for Literacy









> Assessment mailing list









> Assessment at nifl.gov









> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to









> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment









> Email delivered to andresmuro at aol.com









>









>









>









>









>









>









> ________________________________________________________________________









> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -









> http://webmail.aol.com









> -------------------------------









> National Institute for Literacy









> Assessment mailing list









> Assessment at nifl.gov









> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to









> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment









> Email delivered to crandall at umbc.edu









>
























--







JoAnn (Jodi) Crandall







Professor, Education Department







Director, Ph.D. Program in Language, Literacy & Culture







Coordinator, Peace Corps Master's International Program in ESOL/Bilingual







Education







University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)







1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250







ph: 410-455-2313/2376 fax: 410-455-8947/1880







email: crandall at umbc.edu







www.umbc.edu/llc/







www.umbc.edu/esol/







www.umbc.edu/esol/peacecorps.html































-------------------------------







National Institute for Literacy







Assessment mailing list







Assessment at nifl.gov







To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to







http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment







Email delivered to andresmuro at aol.com









More new features than ever. Check
out the new AOL Mail!









-------------------------------

National Institute for Literacy

Assessment mailing list

Assessment at nifl.gov

To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment

Email delivered to taklein at austin.rr.com





-------------------------------



National Institute for Literacy



Assessment mailing list



Assessment at nifl.gov



To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to



http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment



Email delivered to andresmuro at aol.com



















-------------------------------

National Institute for Literacy

Assessment mailing list

Assessment at nifl.gov

To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment

Email delivered to taklein at austin.rr.com





-------------------------------





National Institute for Literacy





Assessment mailing list





Assessment at nifl.gov





To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please
go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment





Email delivered to crandall at umbc.edu











JoAnn (Jodi) Crandall





Professor and Director





Language, Literacy and Culture Ph.D. Program





Director, Peace Corps Master's Intl Program in ESOL/Bilingual
Education





University of Maryland Baltimore County





1000 Hilltop Circle





Baltimore, MD 21250





tel: 410-455-2313





fax: 410-455-8947





eml: crandall at umbc.edu

































_________________________________________________________________
Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!
http://biggestloser.msn.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lincs.ed.gov/pipermail/assessment/attachments/20080208/b6eb1c7c/attachment.html