[Assessment 1315] Re: CASAS vs. BEST
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Fri May 16 08:34:21 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [Assessment 1314] Re: CASAS vs. BEST
- Next message: [Assessment 1317] Re: CASAS vs. BEST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Could someone please tell me how I an have sight of BEST. I have been looking for an adaptive, normative, diagnostic test for ages and this seems as though it might fit the bill.
What flavour of English is it? Yes, you can see that I am of the Queen's English brigade!
Thanks for any help - btw this would be for research purposes not productive use.
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 04:34:28 -0700From: mjjerdems at yahoo.comTo: assessment at nifl.govSubject: [Assessment 1314] Re: CASAS vs. BESTThe BEST is great for assessing the learner's production of English. Its additional pluses are that there are not test forms that learners can learn it identify and recall easily; the test questions become harder or easier depending on how the learner's responses are scored, which mitigates differences between assessors; and it would be better able to identify small progress than CASAS forms. The one major downside is that it takes time and more time as the learners progress. A large program simply cannot afford to put the hours into testing that BEST Plus requires.I've used both CASAS and BEST Plus in smaller programs because one instrument cannot give a full picture on a learner (Assessment 101), and it maximizes the chance to show improvement at post-test. Good luck,Mary Jane JerdeHoward Community College"Rodrick Beiler, Ingrid" <Ingrid.RodrickBeiler at montgomerycountymd.gov> wrote:
I serve as the coordinator for an adult ESOL program in Montgomery County, MD. We offer classes mostly at the beginner level, with some classes at literacy and intermediate levels as well. I am fairly new to this field and am trying to determine the comparative usefulness of CASAS and BEST for assessment of our program. Can anyone comment on how/why their organizations might have chosen one over the other?
In case it is helpful for understanding my organization's needs, here is some more background information: - We serve about 275-300 learners per semester. - Many of our learners have a very low educational level. - Pre- and post-tests are administered by our instructors during the first and last classes of the semester. - Placement tests are administered by coordinators at each of our sites in one-on-one interviews. - We provide 36-48 instructional hours per semester. (I wonder if this precludes our using the BEST.) - Most of our funding comes from two sources (government and a private funder). - The cost of standardized assessments is an important factor to us.
Your advice is much appreciated.
Thanks, Ingrid Rodrick Beiler
Ingrid Rodrick Beiler ESOL Coordinator Linkages to Learning 51 Monroe Street, Suite 1700 Rockville, MD 20850 Phone: (240) 777-1110 Fax: (240) 777-1111 ingrid.rodrickbeiler at montgomerycountymd.gov -------------------------------National Institute for LiteracyAssessment mailing listAssessment at nifl.govTo unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessmentEmail delivered to mjjerdems at yahoo.com
Great deals on almost anything at eBay.co.uk. Search, bid, find and win on eBay today!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...