[Numeracy 186] Re: The double negative language-math link
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Tue Feb 16 16:27:29 EST 2010
- Previous message: [Numeracy 148] The double negative language-math link
- Next message: [Numeracy 187] Re: The double negative language-math link
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The rule in teaching English is that a double negative statement creates
a positive statement, so, for a few students, it makes sense to hang my
hat on the hook they have. Since they know in English " to not not go"
creates a positive statement that you are going (and must be rewritten
as such) it bridges their mental block about double negatives in math
changing to addition problems.
Carol King
Fernley Adult Education
cking at lyon.k12.nv.us
________________________________
From: numeracy-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:numeracy-bounces at nifl.gov] On
Behalf Of Michael Gyori
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:58 AM
To: The Math and Numeracy Discussion List
Subject: [Numeracy 148] The double negative language-math link
Greetings everone,
Carol King stated,
If I am taking out taking out 8, as in 10 - (-8), then I must be adding
it.
I read it a few times and find myself perplexed by it, as much as I
believe I understand its intent.
"Taking out" is a positive statement and regardless of how many times
you say it, it remains positive, and what changes - perhaps, depending
on how I choose to understand it - is the number of times you
(***yes***) "take out." If I take out once, I have 2 left, and I cannot
take take out again, because I can't take another 8 out of 2.
Alternatively, I can understand the meaning to be that I am "taking
out" the taking out of 8, which then could leave me to believe that I
wanted to take out, then decided against it, such that I end up doing
nothing. I still have 10.
The problem, as I see it, is that we are getting into integers.
Negative values have no meaning in the world of the concrete, because
once you have 0 left, that's it. On the other hand, if we deal with
negative balances (such as when you overdraw your balance in your
checking account), you create meaning because it can and does happen.
In other words, negatives carry meaning in mathematical, but not
physical (reality) terms...
Thoughts?
Michael
Michael A. Gyori
Maui International Language School
www.mauilanguage.com <http://www.mauilanguage.com/>
DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me and permanently delete the original and all copies and printouts of this e-mail and any attachments.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lincs.ed.gov/pipermail/numeracy/attachments/20100216/48c40fab/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Numeracy 148] The double negative language-math link
- Next message: [Numeracy 187] Re: The double negative language-math link
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]