[Numeracy 291] relational thinking & progressive alignment
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Mon Apr 5 09:42:02 EDT 2010
- Previous message: [Numeracy 279] Re: Is an absolute value positive?
- Next message: [Numeracy 265] Re: Is an absolute value positive?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I am a grad student at Georgia State University, and I am currently researching teaching relational thinking to children. Relational thinking is thinking that is constrained by the relational roles things play, rather than just the literal features of those things. In math, relational thinking is the basis for algebra. It is also needed to understand the equal sign and other comparative and temporal symbols (>,<, etc.) Further, it is needed to appreciate data analysis and probability (median, mode, etc). I am researching the intervention, progressive alignment (beginning with the easiest and most concrete examples and ending with the abstract concept), and hypothesize that this approach will increase the likelihood that students will be able to transfer their learning of a skill to other settings. Does anyone have any suggestions for places that I should look into to gather my research? Or does anyone have articles in mind that deal specifically with relational thinking and progressive alignment in teaching mathematics? Any suggestions are welcomed and appreciated.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...