[Numeracy 495] Re: What does equality mean?
Archived Content Disclaimer
Please note: This page contains archived content from the lincs.ed.gov e-mail discussion list system, which was disabled in 2012. The content on this page is available for archival purposes only. Hyperlinks on this page may be broken or may no longer link to the content specified from within the archive posting. In addition, information displayed on this page may no longer be relevant.
Tue Aug 17 11:28:37 EDT 2010
- Previous message: [Numeracy 494] Re: What does equality mean?
- Next message: [Numeracy 496] Re: What does equality mean?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think we can; I think he did (each side represents expressions of
On a tangential note, though, one "big idea" I bring up early and often
is the idea that while it seems to the student that we keep changing the
rules in math (you can't subtract 4 from 1... oh, yes, you can... 78 is
bigger than 4 -- but not when that's your fraction denominator...), what
we're asking is for the student to gradually understand things at a
deeper, more complicated level -- and that humans do this all the time.
I usually talk about how little kids learn what a dog is, and call every
hair four legged thing a dog... then learn better.
I try to show how even when it seems like the rules are changing, the
principles haven't; that 4 + 3 is still 7, even if 4 + -3 is 1. One
rather huge challenge is when a student looks at numbers and the
emotions go into SURVIVE mode, wherein abstract thinking is unlikely.
Academic Development Specialist
Center for Academic Success
Champaign, IL 61821
sujones at parkland.edu
>>> Michael Gyori <michael_gyori at yahoo.com> 8/17/2010 12:34 AM >>>
I fail to understand why the definition of equality is subject to
say in relation to the level of numeracy of our students. I have
always understood equality in math to signify equality in value. If you
the same operation on identical values with different expressions, of
course doing so might result in inequality, as you appear to state in
below. My question is, why can we not apply a consistent definition to
when teaching math at whatever level we may be doing so?
Michael A. Gyori
Maui International Language School
From: Chip Burkitt <chip.burkitt at orderingchaos.com>
To: numeracy at nifl.gov
Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 6:59:24 AM
Subject: [Numeracy 493] Re: What does equality mean?
I think the difficulty is that mathematics requires rigorous
logic, especially as one advances in it. However, for ABE or GED
students, it is
usually enough to know that the equal sign is like a balance scale. In
the sides to be in balance, the expressions on both sides must have the
value. If you add something to one side, you must add it to the other
well to maintain the balance. If you subtract from one side, you must
it from the other side as well. When students get into algebra, they
know that some transformations of an expression can change the
character of the
equality. For example (−a)^2 = a^2, but it does NOT follow by taking
root of both sides that −a = a. Likewise, y/(x − 1) = 3 needs to be
x ≠ 1, even though the equation can be transformed to y = 3x − 3, which
solution for x = 1 at y = 0. For most purposes in ABE or GED classes,
balance analogy works well without getting into abstract discussions
various kinds of equivalence relations and the transformations that
relation or leave it unchanged. If anyone has a better explanation of
sign for ABE and GED students, I would like to hear it.
On 8/14/2010 1:04 AM, Michael Gyori wrote:
>After all this discussion about what the equal sign (or equality)
means, I find
>myself somewhat in a maze. A discussion of equality takes us into a
>esoteric realm from the perspective of our students.
>Might it be time to attempt to more clearly (and simply!) define terms
>those who teach math?
>Michael A. Gyori
>Maui International Language School